Orchestrating modes¶
Observation date: October 27, 2026. Playbook counts and port parity are not re-verified every pass — treat specific counts as dated.
An orchestrating mode reads a request, classifies it, and selects a playbook or skill. It depends on a library to do the work. Unlike a composable or lifecycle library, it decides which capability to invoke. See Skill Libraries for those categories.
Lead example: pstack / poteto-mode¶
pstack is maintained by Cursor engineer "poteto", a React core team member. Its canonical source is the pstack/ directory in Cursor's official cursor/plugins marketplace repository. The README states its priority: "throughput without quality is not a goal I aspire to. If you want to go fast, go deep first."
The poteto-mode skill is installed as /poteto-mode, or /pstack:poteto-mode in a host namespace such as Claude Code's. It reads the constraints in its SKILL.md, classifies the request, and selects a playbook and skill for architecture decisions, parallel work, contested designs, or commit and review checks:
architect— cross-boundary design decisionsswarm— parallel-agent coverage matricesarena— design bakeoffs between competing approachesinterrogate— multi-model adversarial review before shipping
poteto-mode selects other pstack skills based on context; it does not perform their work itself. A lifecycle library's slash commands invoke capabilities directly.
Prior research reported 23 playbooks. That count was not re-verified this pass.
Install paths and port drift¶
| Host | Install | Caveat |
|---|---|---|
| Cursor (canonical) | /add-plugin pstack |
The source of truth — other hosts run a generated or adapted copy |
| Claude Code | /plugin marketplace add cursor/plugins then /plugin install pstack@cursor-plugins |
Auto-update is off by default for third-party marketplaces and must be enabled manually in the marketplaces tab |
Claude Code runs a generated adaptation of pstack from harness/pstack/ at the repository root. CI checks that the generator keeps it in sync with the Cursor source.
Steps requiring Cursor-only features such as Bugbot or Automations are skipped on Claude Code with a one-line note. This is documented behavior, not a failure. Compare unexpected behavior with the canonical cursor/plugins source; synchronized files do not establish feature parity.
The unrelated "potato-mode" name collision¶
pstack/poteto-mode is unrelated to aryannaio/potato-mode-agent-skill. The latter is a skill for Claude Code and Codex that measures memory, disk, and CPU headroom, then recommends conservative test-runner and build-tool worker limits. It limits resources for the agent's own commands and does not touch unrelated processes.
The similar names refer to different authors, repositories, and functions: poteto-mode routes requests to skills; potato-mode limits resource use.
How this differs from adjacent categories¶
| Compared to... | The difference |
|---|---|
| A composable library (Skill Libraries) | You select skills from a composable library. An orchestrating mode selects them based on the request. |
| A lifecycle library | A lifecycle library maps skills to fixed stages you invoke by name (/spec, /build). An orchestrating mode classifies free-form requests and routes dynamically — there's no fixed command per stage. |
| A native runtime | A runtime (Claude Code, Codex CLI, Cursor) executes tool calls and manages sessions. poteto-mode runs inside it and adds library-specific playbook selection. |
| A methodology (such as Superpowers) | Superpowers prescribes an end-to-end sequence, including brainstorming before planning. poteto-mode selects skills per request without owning the full development lifecycle. |
When explicit routing helps¶
Our interpretation follows the three-layer model: as models improve at classifying requests, they may need less explicit routing for simple tasks. Routing may remain useful where playbook selection depends on project-specific judgment, such as contested designs or cross-boundary architecture.
The category is too new to establish how long that advantage will last. Adopt an orchestrating mode for a demonstrated routing need, not as a permanent architectural requirement.
Related pages¶
- State of the Skills Market — where orchestrating modes sit in the full taxonomy
- Skill Libraries — the libraries an orchestrating mode dispatches into
- Distribution and Governance — installation and compatibility mechanics, including native marketplace auto-update behavior
- Choosing a Skills Approach — when to reach for an orchestrating mode versus a library or methodology
- Superpowers — a skill-driven methodology, for comparison